COVID-19 Update: Click Here

Best Lawyers - Best Law Firms 2020
Justia Badge
Lawyers Weekly
Super Lawyers.
Super Lawyers
WBA Supporter
Massachusetts Academy of Trial Attorneys
The National Trial Lawyers
Top Ten Ranking
Top 40 Under 40
Top 100
Best Lawyers 2020 Badge
Peer Rated

$150,000 Settlement for Medical Malpractice - Delay in Diagnosis of Benign Prostate Cancer

In 1996, prostate biopsy specimens of the 66-year-old plaintiff were reviewed by the defendant pathologist and reported to be "benign prostatic hyperplasia." Three years later, a second pathologist reviewed the slides and reported the presence of prostate cancer on three of the slides, and an amended report was issued.

The plaintiff was advised of the misread by his urologist. A subsequent biopsy showed the presence of prostate cancer, although the presence of metastatic disease was not confirmed. The plaintiff was treated with radiation and hormone therapy, and no radiographic evidence of reoccurrence or metastatic disease to any organ was found in a subsequent follow-up.

The plaintiff and his wife filed a complaint alleging that the defendant deviated from the standard of care in failing to diagnose and report the presence of prostate cancer in 1996, and as a result the plaintiff's cancer was not diagnosed until some two-and-a-half years later, causing him to suffer a lost opportunity for cure.

The defendant and his expert contended that the diagnosis of benign prostatic hyperplasia was well within the standard of care. More importantly, however, the defendant and his experts were expected to testify at trial that the plaintiff did not have metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis nor was he shown to have metastatic disease at any time thereafter, and accordingly he did not suffer any injuries as a result of the delay in diagnosis.

The defendant counsel was expected to move to preclude any evidence of lost opportunity for cure on the grounds that such evidence would be speculative given the lack of metastatic disease.

Client Reviews
We wanted to thank you again so much for all you did for us and your support throughout this ordeal. You did a great job for us and we truly appreciate it. We wish you well always. Dot and Alex
We are extremely happy that we chose Kathy Jo Cook as our attorney. She brings experience, knowledge and compassion into the complicated legal process. Day or night, Attorney Cook always had time to talk to us and answer any questions we had throughout. We highly recommend her. Christopher & Mary Casella
KJC Law firm handled my case and I was very pleased with the results. The Team there always returned my calls or emails quickly. They are very direct and upfront on how they feel the case will go and the best ways of handling it. I would definitely call them again should I need their assistance and will recommend them to others highly. J G.
Law firm represented myself and another individual in a work related age discrimination case and was successful in obtaining a settlement in our favor. Couldn't be happier with the results and the representation. Mike K.
I have worked with Kathy Jo Cook for over a decade. She has represented me in both personal and professional matters and has given 150% every time. Kathy Jo is hardworking and always has my best interests in mind. She is professional and reliable and has been accessible as needed, even after business hours. Kathy has expertise in many areas of law and is incredibly fair and ethical in her client work. We secured favorable outcomes every time that have enabled me to enjoy more happiness, health and success in my life. Mindy