Justia Badge
Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly badge
AV Preeminent badge
Avvo Rating Badge
Super Lawyers badge - Kathy Jo Cook
Super Lawyers badge - John T. Martin
WBA Supporter badge
Massachusetts Academy of Trial Attorneys badge
Top 100 Trial Lawyers badge
NAOPIA - Top Ten Rating 2014 badge
Top 40 under 40 badge
Avvo client's choice award 2018 - Benjamin H. Duggan

$100,000 Settlement for Medical Malpractice - Second Surgery Required After Removal of Wrong Portion of Rib

The plaintiff, an 81-year-old male, was diagnosed with prostate cancer in early 1997. A bone scan was performed and showed an area of abnormal uptake. The urologist was concerned that the finding could represent bone metastases. He referred the plaintiff to a surgeon for bone biopsy.

The plaintiff was admitted to the hospital for the procedure. Because the lesion could not be seen on the bone, the surgeon sought the assistance of a radiologist for pre-operative marking. Using fluoroscopy, the surgeon and the radiologist marked the area where the lesion was thought to be on the posterior ninth rib with a dye known as Methylene Blue.

Following the marking, the surgeon took the plaintiff to the operating room for the surgical procedure. He made an incision and visualized a blue rib segment, which he removed. A post-operative X-ray revealed that a segment of the eighth rib rather than a segment of the ninth rib had been removed. A second surgery was required to remove the appropriate rib segment. The defendant surgeon reinforced the chest wall by suturing polypropylene mesh in a double layer between the seventh and 10th ribs.

The plaintiff experienced pain and difficulty lifting following the procedures. The plaintiff's expert testified that the pain was the result of mesh having come in contact with nerve fibers.

The defendant's expert testified that mesh is commonly used as a reinforcing material, and there was no evidence that the mesh had caused any problems. He further testified that pain following thoracic surgery is not uncommon, and some individuals experience it on a long-term basis. Furthermore, it was argued, there was no evidence that the pain was caused from the secondary surgery as opposed to the first.

The case settled during trial.

Client Reviews
★★★★★
We wanted to thank you again so much for all you did for us and your support throughout this ordeal. You did a great job for us and we truly appreciate it. We wish you well always. Dot and Alex
★★★★★
We are extremely happy that we chose Kathy Jo Cook as our attorney. She brings experience, knowledge and compassion into the complicated legal process. Day or night, Attorney Cook always had time to talk to us and answer any questions we had throughout. We highly recommend her. Christopher & Mary Casella
★★★★★
KJC Law firm handled my case and I was very pleased with the results. The Team there always returned my calls or emails quickly. They are very direct and upfront on how they feel the case will go and the best ways of handling it. I would definitely call them again should I need their assistance and will recommend them to others highly. J G.
★★★★★
Law firm represented myself and another individual in a work related age discrimination case and was successful in obtaining a settlement in our favor. Couldn't be happier with the results and the representation. Mike K.
★★★★★
I have worked with Kathy Jo Cook for over a decade. She has represented me in both personal and professional matters and has given 150% every time. Kathy Jo is hardworking and always has my best interests in mind. She is professional and reliable and has been accessible as needed, even after business hours. Kathy has expertise in many areas of law and is incredibly fair and ethical in her client work. We secured favorable outcomes every time that have enabled me to enjoy more happiness, health and success in my life. Mindy